Template-Type: ReDIF-Article 1.0 Author-Name: Concepción Martínez Alcalá Author-Name: Encarnación Moral Pajares Title: Importancia desigual de la población extranjera en las provincias españolas: Factores determinantes Abstract:

Resumen

España es una de las economías del mundo que registran una mayor densidad inmigratoria. La población con nacionalidad extranjera y residente en el país ha mantenido una elevada tasa de crecimiento durante la década 2000, representando en 2011 más del 12 por cien del total. Sin embargo, este colectivo no se reparte de forma homogénea en el territorio nacional y se advierten importantes diferencias en la proporción de extranjeros que registran las distintas provincias españolas. El objetivo de este trabajo es investigar, de acuerdo con los argumentos teóricos analizados y utilizando la técnica estadística de datos de panel, los factores económicos y extraeconómicos que han condicionado esta situación.

Abstract

According to INE, the Spanish statistics office, at the beginning of the year 2000 there were 923,879 foreign nationals living in Spain, whobarely accounted for 2.2% of the total population, when in nearby countries such as France, Ireland, Germany, Luxembourg and Austria this population group exceeded 10%.Eleven years later, Spain had 5,751,487 foreign citizens – an aggregate growth of over 500%with a mean annual cumulative change of 18% – who constituted the principle component of the total number of persons born abroad residing in this country.According to the OECD (2009), the countrywith the greatest rise worldwide in the proportion of foreigners relative to the total population during the first decade of the 21st century was Spain, at over 12%.During the early 2010s their proportion remained practically constant,largely because of aslowdown in thegrowth of this population group,a situation thatLacuesta& Puente (2010) attributed to the downturn in economic activity in Spainand its adverse effects on the labour market.   However, these figures do not signify that foreigners are evenly distributed among the provinces of Spain, which show major differences in migration density.In 2011, foreigners accounted for over 20% of the total population in four provinces (Alicante, Almería, Balearic Islands and Girona).In contrast, the provinces of Asturias, Badajoz, Caceres, Cadiz, Cordoba, Corunna, Jaen, Lugo, Palencia, Pontevedra, Seville and Zamorahad low percentages of immigrants, all below 5%.The aim of this research was to examine the factors that led to disparities in migration density between the Spanish provinces during the first decade of the 21st century, a period when the weight of the registered foreign population increased spectacularly, partly due to immigrant regularisations (Simón, Lázaro&Sánchez, 2009).Above all, it attempts to identify the factors that may have influenced the unequal prominence of foreigners within the total population of each province.In other words, it tries to find out why foreigners constitute over 12% of the population of certain provinces, which receive both inter- and intra-national flows of foreign populations, given that the distribution of Spanish nationals remained practically constant over the period under study.   The task of measuring international migration faces numerous obstacles related to the definition of ‘immigrant’, the measurement method employed, statistical coordination, irregular immigration, etc. (Duque, 2011).As this study focuses on Spain, it was considered appropriate to use the foreign population figures provided by INE, specifically those furnished by the municipal registers of inhabitants (padrón).These administrative registers listing the inhabitants of the municipality are managed by the autonomous regions, which bearthe legal responsibility for statistics in their area, so coordination and planning of the statistical output of the regional offices is ensured and the problem of incoherence and incompatibility between the data is eliminated.   Based on the foregoing, this research studies the pull factors that influence the arrival of foreign citizens in the different provinces of Spain and lead to heterogeneous migration densitiesin the different regions of the national economy.The main innovation in this study is that together with variables examined in previous studies, such as per capita income, unemployment rates and the stock of foreigners already residing in the place of destination, it also includes the features of the productive fabric of the provinces where they settle.However, it does not examine some classic variables used in other studies of immigrants arriving in Spain, such as geographical proximity, cultural affinity or language, regularisations or applications for visas, the existence or otherwise of a welfare state, or political stability (Casado, Molina &Oyarzun, 2003; Cebrián, 2009), as the objectof study is not why foreigners come to Spain but the unequal prominence of the foreign population group in the 50 provinces of this country, which influences the inhabitants’ perceptions of thereality.Above all, this study investigates the gravitational effect of the aspects of the economy of the host province that are considered most relevant in the light of the literature reviewed.   Other studies have explored the importance of migratory flows in particular provinces or districts of Spain (Sandell, 2009; Simón, Lázaro& Sánchez, 2009 and 2010; Rodríguez, 2010).However, they have not analysed the variables that lead to an uneven distribution of foreigners between provinces, causing important differences in the pressure of this aggregate on the total population of each.   Based on the findings of this study and estimating a panel data model with both spatial and temporalfixed effects, it was found that between the years 2000 and 2011 the migration density of Spanish provinces was influenced by the type of production activity carried out in the province, its per capita GDP and the multiplication of immigrants in a network, as argued by Marcu and Gómez (2010). The unemployment rate and percentage of production activity were not significant.Indeed, it is the provincial economies where structural changeshave caused a shift towards the service sector that have a relatively greater percentage of foreigners.In these provinces, conditions in the production system have allowed the existence of a dual labour market which attracts foreigners who hope to find work.They mainly take jobs that are in little demand among the Spanish population, so do not affect the province’s relative unemployment rate.Also, as the immigrant population living in the area rises there is a greater probability of this group’s increasing its relative weight, since the rate of change in thelocalpopulation is low and in some cases even negative.   The differences in production specialisation in the 50 provinces of Spain are very important for explaining their disparate migration densities.Also, it could be argued from thesefindings that the presence of foreigners encourages the arrival of more foreigners.The way the network effect works in the migration project, influenced by the living conditions of the society of origin, explains how the phenomenon becomes self-sustaining.   This analysis also suggests an interpretation ofwhythe decline in economic activity and increased unemployment in the provinces of Spain from 2008 onwards have not led to a major reduction in the proportional weight of the immigrant population.   This paper is organised into four sections.The introductory first section is followed by the theoretical arguments on which this research is based and the hypotheses to be tested.Section 3 describes the estimated empirical model and the results of the analysis.The last section presents the main conclusions. Classification-JEL: R1 Keywords: Población extranejra, Foreign population, Determinantes económicos, Economics determinants, Estructura productiva, Productive structure, Provincias, Province, España, Spain Pages: 109-130 Volume: 2 Year: 2015 File-URL: http://www.revistaestudiosregionales.com/documentos/articulos/pdf-articulo-2471.pdf File-Format: Application/pdf Handle: RePEc:rer:articu:v:2:y:2015:p:109-130